dj juicy m djay algoriddim

DJ Juicy M — pushing buttons, mainly yours

Juicy M – 4 iPads mix

Had so much fun playing on 4 iPads with djay appCheck it out :)

Posted by DJ Juicy M on Friday, 1 April 2016

 

On Friday, DJ Juicy M pumped out another video. This one however was a little more interesting in that she’d replaced turntables and CDJs with iPad Pros running algoriddim djay Pro. And it seems that there are a few things in this video that have clearly pissed off a few people, if the truly depressing comments are anything to go by. Let’s cover them off.

NO TURNTABLES

Are we still talking about this in 2016? Why is this still an issue? Is that #realdjing nonsense still a thing? DJing has evolved to be many things, and in recent times has done a full 360 and come all the way back to turntables again. But all the stops on the journey are all valid, and if you care to look through her Youtube channel you can she that she has and can use each and every one of them. Floors are still filled by people not using turntables, just as floors are emptied by those that do.

And a quick heads up for those who wish to throw sync button DJing at her — djay Pro can sync all four decks inside a single iPad, but it cannot sync across devices, and in this video each iPad is a deck connected only to the mixer. So no sync button is in play here, which does rather piss on that hate bonfire.

You might not use them, but people rocking CDJs, controllers, and mobile devices are all keeping dance floors of different sizes blissfully happy. It’s all DJing to me. Turntables do not make you a DJ — skills do.

NO HEADPHONES

So let me get this right — because she’s not using headphones in this set, she’s a fake? Let me just go through the last thirteen years of DMC championship DVDs I have on the shelf in front of me and see how many of the word class competitors and importantly winners are wearing headphones… yeah pretty much none.

No headphones doesn’t denote a lack of skills, but does show that the set has been created and practiced over and over until honed to perfection. I’m not saying that Juicy M is on a par with DMC winners — apples and oranges right there. But what I am saying is that they’ve all worked hard to create a set that can be performed without headphones. What some call fakery, I call dedication.

NO PENIS

This is perhaps the real issue for a lot of people. For some reason, a few DJs feel that daring to play music to a crowd while in possession of a vagina is a cardinal sin, perhaps even worse than pressing a sync button. Granted, she has looks on her side which is a benefit when standing in front of said crowd of mad-for-it clubbers, and for making videos for social media too. But some of the sexism and misogyny being spouted in those comments isn’t funny or ironic — it’s sickening and smacks of insecurity.

Having a penis shouldn’t get anyone a pass. Nor should having a vagina hold anyone back. There are no physical barriers to entry in DJing — it’s all about how you present yourself and play your music. One this is certain — she has bigger balls than all the haters.

dj juicy m djay algoriddim

I’ll be honest — a lot of Juicy M’s sets are not my taste at all. Not every turntablist set is either, and I’ve walked out on some big name dance DJs through sheer boredom. But I can see that she’s worked hard to put her sets together. She clearly loves what she does, and pumps huge amounts of positivity energy into her work. Others however choose to pump hate into a keyboard and think that makes them a better DJ. How’s that working out for you?

What’s even more telling is that despite the disparaging comments, sexism, misogyny, and outright hate being spouted, she’s still out there putting out sets, and equally pushing the boundaries. I haven’t seen anyone do a four deck iPad set before, and she did this knowing that she’d get am all new world of unwarranted crap coming her way. Are you so brave?

Is Juicy M the world’s best DJ? No. But 3.5 million Facebook fans and a solid gig calendar does say a lot about her popularity and ability. But she’s out there working hard against the odds to become not only a skilled DJ but a successful one too. She is living the DJ dream through sheer hard work — and winning. And for that she has my upmost respect.

The Old Owner
  1. People hate what they don’t understand. DJ Juicy M, do your thing and don’t look back. Mark, you nailed the issue on the last argument. Competence will always outdo ignorance.

  2. Well said Mark! I’ll repeat here what I posted when Mojaxx shared the 4 iPads video on Facebook:

    It’s fine to not like what Juicy M plays, or disagree with the way she does it, but she’s just doing what she needs to do to get paid in the scene/industry that she is in. And as Chris said, it’s not fake, she can mix; how can you get mad at that when you have “DJs” out here pressing play on a mix CD doing nothing and faking their entire set?

    Also, it’s funny how people who hate on Juicy M never post this video of her… https://www.facebook.com/djjuicym/videos/vb.145864485469478/265656723444980

  3. I like her. If she can rock a crowd, who cares how she does it.. Nothing wrong with being prepared either. Some of us like to wing it, some like to remake their sets. Either way, it takes a lot of confidence to do it. Glad she has it.

  4. Amen to that. I see the same in Photography. Pissed-off old schoolers think you’re nothing until you’ve shot with a Leica M6 are the #RealDJ of pictures.

    1. I don’t care what you use, just as long as you’re actually using it. Mr. Tape is awesome, but so too is Jeremy Ellis… these guys don’t fake it.

      I assume you feel the same about Photography. Wouldn’t you want the photographer who took and edited the picture to get credit, not some pretty person someone thought would be “more presentable.”

  5. “…NO TURNTABLES Are we still talking about this in 2016? Why is this still an issue? Is that #realdjing nonsense still a thing?…”

    There goes by a blog which has been posting constantly & in majority about anything related to turntables & turntablists. Way to go! Maybe instead of blogging, y’all should get some “target group” advice.

    Nevertheless, it’s hilarious to come in here and check how many times you can still cancel yourselves by your very own writings.

    1. …and Mark also posts about DJ controllers and iPad apps and music production gear. It’s a DJ site and they live for the technology written about passionate contributers.

      I don’t think there’s a majority of turntable posts around here… quite the opposite as new TT’s rarely ‘wow’ anymore.

      It’s a DJ technology site… not quite as “Skratchworx” as it once was.

      1. Anything related to turntables, from new scratch mixers to DVS to new video routines, is by definition a vinyl topic. It’s a matter of medium, not how it is applied.

        Just try and go through the last 3 pages of posts.

        1. I went through the last 6 months. If I generously stretch the parameters to include all turntables, vinyl, software with DVS, and performances, the total is only 28%. If I restrict to pure turntable or pure vinyl stories, it’s 12%.

          1. I don’t want to stretch this too much, as it’s obviously your choice what to put up in here, but right now in your main page your got 3 posts related to vinyl and in your popular list (down in the main page) 3 out of 5 articles are related again to vinyl.

        2. I think there’s just been a quieter time with the controllers since NAMM. We go though cycles on here where you her large noting for ages since then suddenly many items. It’s a mixed bag really… which is good as I have both Technics and Xone 43c and Traktor S8 so like to mix it up.

    2. I’m pretty sure that you’re getting lost in your own argument here, and having a go for the sake of it. I genuinely cannot see the point you’re trying to make.

      DJWORX is a technology site. That’s all DJ technology and not just digital, and it’s written by a group of people with an incredibly wide range of preferences and experiences, and these are expressed in our work. We don’t have one voice, and instead offer a range of opinions to be chewed over.

      We are definitely not a turntablist specific site. That was skratchworx, and only for the first few years of its existence. That site is over now and only exists as an archive. We talk about turntables when there’s something to talk about, and in the last couple of years there has been more to talk about, but not more than anything else. Perhaps you notice those stories more because that’s your chosen DJ gear.

      And we will continue to talk about them, along with controllers, media players, mobile devices, and just about anything that falls under our remit of “DJ technology”. And frankly, we’ll talk about anything we choose to.

      The point that everyone else got is that 15 years after CDJs came along and changed the game, is the fact that people are still hammering on about no turntables and no headphones is ridiculous. DJing is a melting pot, to the point where producing is being adding into that melting pot as well. Real DJing shouldn’t even be an issue anymore.

      I absolutely urge anyone and everyone to debate points with us constructively. We sure as hell don’t know everything, and genuinely wish to learn from our large and clever community. But don’t waste your energy trying to tell me what DJWORX is and isn’t about.

      1. Essay alert but whatever.

        I sure as hell know what skratchworx was. That is why I’m still around here. But I have no idea what djworx is.

        You bash against #realdjing with every single chance you find, yet you post 7/10 articles related to vinyl and/or turntablism (and making a revenue from). You preach on people about the equality of contemporary DJing, yet you frequently remind everyone about barriers by bringing up topics like “vinyl kills DJing”.

        Since you choose to play on both sides of the fence, then be prepared to hear also both sides’ branging.

        I’m just on one side.

        1. DJWORX is what skratchworx was for the last 7 years of its life. The reality is that nothing has really changed except the name and the look, which I imagine is why you’re still here.

          So to #realdjing. My stance is not against turntables or turntablists. My issue with #realdjing is when it’s used in the sense of the only real DJing is done on turntables and vinyl. That’s most often how I see it used, and that’s elitist rubbish right there.

          So we can post stories about the brilliance of turntables, and equally about how the paradigm is hurting DJ technology evolution, because we all have them on the team, and is the only permanent fixture in my setup.

          To be clear, the articles posted here come from a variety of people, and within the team we can get heated about things too. It would be a very boring site if it was just saying how brilliant one thing was. I hope that’s made things a little clearer.

  6. I don’t like the music but, to say she can’t DJ is stupid. She understands the concepts to mixing. Also to say she’s not keeping it real, well none of us are while using DVS.

    She can spin (or swipe) in this case but, what I really wonder is her success greatly helped by her appearance. What if she was a very unattractive girl? Would we be talking about her on djworx? Would the internets care?

    1. Her appearance is probably a big part of why this discussion is being had. But why that is is probably not what most people think.

      Being attractive gives the haters another attack vector. Even though I believe any girl/woman gets the misogynistic treatment, having looks that are generally perceived as more attractive adds that “she only gets gigs because of her looks” attack vector.

      In the haters’ view, no girl can be as talented as a guy, and if you have good looks then even less so.

  7. I’ve thought it for as long as he’s been doing it but never mentioned it before but really wanted to ask Mojaxx to stop with this #realdjing rubbish. I genuinely think he’s the most informative person on the Internet but having lots of followers and power can lead to pushing an agenda and the #realdjing route isn’t a good one.

    I actually get frustrated when I see his Instagram posts with it on and it even flashed up in a video he did recently.

    Everytime a record it turntable is used the “#realdjing” tag gets branded about. That hashtag needs to die and to die now.

    Stop this #realdjing once and for all. It’s only fueling the fire of hate and driving a wedge between opinions.

    I say this looking at my Technics 1210s and Xone 43c on one side of the room and my Traktor S8 next to it… two different technologies but one would have #realdjing written all over it.

    Stop it now.

    #WeAreAllDJs

  8. She is good and got skills but too much of a wacko for my liking. She reminds me of Paris Hilton when it comes to looks and popularity. The problem with the Disc Jockey scene is that it has been filled with penises just like the “cockpit” with male pilots. It will take decades to wash the eyes and perceptions.

        1. I had no idea as to who she was, but I’m also someone who spent half an hour being detailed by police officers because I couldn’t name two Lady Gaga songs. I’m also the guy who said “who the (censored) is Sum 41!?!?!??!?!?!” because a coworker was freaking out they came into the place we were working at (fast food at the time)……. Pretty much to their faces, and I said it straight faced too.

  9. She clearly has a hip-hop / turtablism background. The way she developes livesets and exhibitions shows that (no headphones, lot of track slamming, and so on). She is just clever and applies her knowledge and technique to EDM crap in order to make money.

  10. Music is too predictable, even on turntables i couldnt bare listening to this wack ish.

    So in this case it doesnt matter what she uses, the music matters most.

      1. it does, im saying it doesnt matter what she uses in this video as the music belongs in the bin, well its not even bin worthy, its toxic waste container worthy, nuke her hardrive

        1. and for that reason I doubt you get any of her audience or gigs. you would experience total failure at places where lots and lots would rather hear what you call toxic wast. you to old for this shit

          1. if i was 14 i would still consider this the biggest and fakest trash a DJ can play, its nothing to do with age so being old or young is a retarted argument

  11. Are you not entertained?

    I was, OK, not my musical taste but not seen anyone else do this with 4 iPads, good on her for doing something interesting and putting it out there.

  12. …….. and another thing, at £1800 a pair for two full size iPad pro’s with 256 GB each, Pioneer should be nervous about this video, I can see a future for the set up JM used.

  13. You could not have said it any better Mark. Totally in agreement. She has dared to try something different. Not many people have the guts to do that.

    I personally like the ipad for Djing so being able to use 4 pro editions with DJ as individual players is quite frankly awesome.

    The latest Pioneer CDJ’s are a hybrid of touch screen and traditional hardware control. So using this 4 deck setup is certainly cheaper setup than the equivalent pioneer. Plus actually gives you more options, each player having it’s own FX and other types of controls. All you are missing is the full on platter and pitch controls.

    I have 3 ipads hanging around and an S8 might give it a go at some point.

  14. Frankly I think it’s a fantastic idea to use this setup because of the potential crowd engagement. I’ve taken to leaning whatever I’m playing on forward so that people can actually see what I’m doing, and it really seems to help convey what’s happening in the booth. Running a setup like this, where the crowd can actually see the waveforms and what you’re doing to them, seems like a great way to use the technology. I’d still want some physical midi control, but I think this is a great setup to consider, once people get over the gimmick-hating reactions.

  15. Nothing against what she is doing at all, only thing that bores me a bit is that all her routines are massively pre planned and only last a few minutes, would be interesting to see how she plans out a 3 hour set smashing tracks in every 20 seconds.

    She is one of the few DJs I’ve seen who sync beats and i actually think its using the technology for what it was intended.

  16. After she posted that cdj video that was broken down and proven to be a pre-made set, I can’t respect her or take her seriously. And for real, we’re in a time where video editing can be done so well, it’s hard telling what’s real and what’s fake. Maybe I’m being stubborn here, but when it comes to djing a fake set, one strike and you’re out for me.

    1. I think there’s definitely some ingenuine moments here, but that doesn’t change the fact that she’s more an entertainer, and less a performer. In my observation, the changes to the music are not all driven by her, (maybe none of them are and she’s just going through the motions), but she’s selling a fantasy… and I believe that’s what the company she’s working for seems to care about.

  17. Not even an issue, girl, guy, man, old lady, it is just a Dj set, to pick it apart is natural for those of us(mostly being guys that are Djs or enthusiasts). But what we are forgetting is that the views and followers of Juicy or any Dj or YouTube post is that of a crowd mentality. Not a hands on approach. And no matter how it was made, fake, cut, whatever, the fact that she has a name and a solid career/guts to perform tells me she learned to capture an audience(dj).

    No use hating, what she does is just a fantasy for many of us.
    For me no matter how good of a set I ever make for now my only claim is a decent wedding gig. No way I can hate.

    1. I’d like to respond to the “She has a name and a solid career” part.

      I’d say right now, if you are a pretty woman and you want to be a DJ, you have a distinct advantage over all men, especially if you’re willing to be the window dressing for a group that presents itself as *whomever the entertainer is.*

      Sure, Juicy M’s young and pretty, (that will get you far in life on that alone), but I don’t believe she is a stand-alone unit. I have to believe Juicy M has the skills to pull off a set like this (because her timing is very close), but the team puts her on “window dressing duty”, and that’s what I believe is the core of the grousing here. This isn’t “her set” it’s “their set”, and being “their set” means she’s got to do things which are not natural for her. Now granted, I’m not in my 20s, and I’m not a pretty woman, so I sound like I’m jealous (I’m not, I wish her much luck), but I know lots of people with at least her level of skill that make no traction in this world, simply because they aren’t pretty (and women).

      Case-in-point: Jeremy Ellis (of Mostly Robot) is awesome on his drum machines, just as DJ Q-bert is awesome with turntables, Moldover is great with his controllers (and pretty good on guitar), Shiftee is great for both drum machines and turntable scratching (the list is very long, sorry for leaving anyone out) but they’re barely known outside a very niche, electronic music circle.

      It’s unrealistic for anyone to believe they can achieve this level of fame without the talent, the look and most importantly the money and connections. Maybe there should be an article about how to get hooked up with a PR firm to advance your DJ career?

      1. I agree about having a team. Because doing it solo and In which I do is hard as F#€k and alot of the times its too much on my plate.

      2. I’d like to respond to this part:
        ‘I’d say right now, if you are a pretty woman and you want to be a DJ, you have a distinct advantage over all men, especially if you’re willing to be the window dressing for a group that presents itself as *whomever the entertainer is.*’

        Granted, there are some advantages to be had as a woman and more so if you have the looks. But those advantages are offset by having to live up to a higher standard to be accepted as “the real deal” (if that ever is possible). Combine that with all the misogyny that women face, regardless of skill level, and the supposed advantages will matter less and less.

        Being the “window dressing” is just something that adds to that imbalance of judgement.

          1. Yes, I do understand that and agree on it. However, what I am saying is that the “being a pretty woman in a male dominated environment” advantage is a double edged sword. In this case it also means having to put up with the general misogyny as well as being more harshly judged than a male with equivalent talent/skill level.

            I can’t recall anyone saying “well, he only gets gigs because of his looks”. Perhaps with the only exception being that Pauly (or whatever his name is) guy from Jersey shore – and even then I don’t think his looks were mentioned.

            I hate to share it, but this is the kind of crap that gets circulated on the net when you are a (good looking in some instances) female DJ sharing sets:
            https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=30Tw9h3poLI

            I have yet to see this being done to a male DJ, except maybe for the previously mentioned Pauly dude.

              1. Yeah, fair enough though the argument can be made that it in no way focused on the gender (like the breasts did in the Juicy M video I linked).

        1. Ummm, not so sure . These conversations never come up about the female turntablist Short-e. Ya know why? Cause she’s legitimately a bad ass turntablist? There no questions about real or pretend.
          Nobody is holding her to a different standard.

          1. Dj Shortee is great, and she’s been at it for a long time, from back when female DJs were about as rare as a unicorn. Whether that has been an advantage compared to today or not, I can’t tell or even speculate about.
            Today she is a well established turntablist. I don’t know if she had to work harder to reach this point due to being a female or not, but how she’s judged today is not necessarily indicative of how she was judged working her way up. That said, I truly hope she was treated in a fair manner.

            By looking at a few Youtube comments on her videos, I can agree that it seems like she’s not held to a different standard today. It does not paint the entire picture since we don’t know what type of private correspondence (email etc.) she gets from random people, but I sure hope it’s at least close to it.

            Gender bias is a systematic problem, and as such it needs to be looked at as a whole. Yes, there might (hopefully) be some individuals in each field that aren’t affected by it. But as long as those individuals are deviating from what is the norm we still have work to do.

  18. Surprised there is this much positive in this topic so far. I already posted my 2 cents. If I had to add anything to the conversation, it’s to say kudos to her and career.

    1. I saw Jeremy Ellis live a couple years back… yeah, he’s the real deal. He wasn’t DJing, he was performing every note. There is no way he faked anything he did there. I think he’s got #TheFastestFingersInTheWest

  19. I give props where props are due and this chick might practice a routine. But she kills her sets and keeps the energy pumpin’ . Mixing is a craft a we define our sound by how we mix.

  20. I’m not sure she’s not pulling a Paris. I was looking at her transitions and other triggers, and found she wasn’t doing things when the changes happened. I’m sure she practiced a bunch to look like she was, but there are times that the incoming “hit” from a track was there before she moved the fader, and it seemed almost unimportant that she was tapping sections of a track, as they made no difference to the sound.

    I get that she’s a pretty, young, woman, and people will pay a lot of money just to be around pretty people, and I’m sure that set will keep a dance floor happy somewhere, but she doesn’t seem to be actually mixing… which is why I believe she’s “pulling a Paris.”

    1. Zzzzz. She can mix and scratch on vinyl records. She can mix and scratch on CDs. The only “dong a Paris” she is dong is having terrible taste in music.

      1. I don’t doubt she has the skills to do something similar, but this set didn’t look right to me so I looked at it again and observed tracks rolling before they were cued. Sounds coming up before the fader was moved, triggers and scratch moves off-time, and other little things that a non-DJ might miss. I don’t wish her ill, but I don’t think it’s cool to play off like you’re doing something you’re not. Wasn’t there some “fakey CD mishap” with her in the past? Please tell me how she’s cueing up and beat-mixing without any headphones… that’s a real trick.

        1. Not hard to do that with cue points and/or chopping the audio files themselves up so they start right at the point you want them to. Then just add in a bunch of planning (and practice) ahead of time until you get the run in good and solid, then record.

          Shiftee and Q-Bert do a lot of things without headphones, yet I don’t see people calling them “fakes” or the like when it’s done on the DMC stage.

          1. Isn’t that because they’re doing whatever it is analogue? Both of those guys scratch on vinyl, and Shiftee hits the buttons (with light-up feed back) to the exact moment, every time… but I don’t know, maybe there’s a conspiracy here… maybe they’re just better at covering up their pantomimes?

            I think it’s shitty for a DJ with her skills to have to pantomime work she can do over a video that was created to showcase what the “project manager” wanted. I truly hope she unseats Paris Hilton, because Juicy M has talent… as well as boobs.

          2. I use DJ 2 on a Numark IDJ Pro and I use all 4 queue point on every one of the 3000+ tracks I have. When you are used to the tracks (know them inside and out) and actually pay attention to the wave forms on screen, i can run entire sets without headphones for the most part, and that’s many times without any practiced set in mind, across broad genres, etc., as long as I make the BPMs match So I agree with White Wulfe here…. ^^^^

    2. Because the audio is a tad out of sync on FB, I downloaded the video and watched it a few times. Knowing djay Pro as well as I do, I see no fakery. It all looks to be happening exactly as it sounds. If you want to point to particular moments, I’ll take another look.

      1. Here’s my quick observation of the first 5 minutes:

        I’ll give her that Sync can start two different turntables at the same time in sync (possible). At :15, she lines up a cue point with no marker and no headphone pre-listen (suspect). The last two bass drum hits at :40 are missing from the mix even though you see the same velocity of touch and a trigger response on the iPad (this is an obvious omission). At the 1:15 mark (where she pulls down tracks 1 and 2 and swaps deck 3 for 4), the track in deck 4 made a drastic change to what it was playing before. Please tell me what’s going on at 4:20… She plays the song and it sounds like Arabic horns, but then she stabs all over the place as though she’s playing cues… it doesn’t jive with the inputs.

        Quick Recap: :40 and 4:20 are pretty big gaffs.

        Also, throughout her set, she’s reaching to touch knobs, but not actually turning them. Again, she looks like she has the skills to do a lot of what she’s doing (because she keeps it together pretty well), but there are some obvious moments here…

        1. To be clear — sync isn’t be used here. Each iPad is an individual deck in this video and can’t actually be synced. You can see her manually adjust pitch a number of times when she loads a track in.

          Djay also has the feature of loading tracks with preserved cue points (not hot cues). So if she loads anything in, it should automatically start from that cue point when she presses play.

          0:40 — I’ve watched the sample button presses in full HD and while some are feint, they’re there. It comes down to how djay shows the button presses. It responds to the length of time they’re pressed.

          1:15 — The drastic track change makes total sense. She slams track three to four.

          At 4:20 she’s using slicer mode. It’s a bit of a racket, but genuine nonetheless.

          Granted, she does do a lot of EQ touching. Sometimes, it’s small amounts, sometimes nothing happens. But loads of DJs do that — it’s all part of the performance and becomes a reflex move — not so much to change anything but are about making sure it’s at the right setting.

          1. OK, then tell me how she touches both iPad start buttons at the exact same time. Also, I don’t think the program running on those iPads don’t have velocity sensitivity. I re-listened to the :40 mark again and again, her last two hits are definitely not off-time, they’re not there. Watch and listen to the slams at 1:15… that track in deck 3 over-rides deck 4 most of the time (as proven by her fader up-fader down movements 2 times), but she’s about a half-second late making the transition that brings in the stabs (use the back-spins on decks 1 and 2 as a reference for time-sync, just prior to this transition), the waveform on decks 3 and 4 also back this up… just like the stabs at 4:20. At 4:20, her fingers are not in time with the played stabs… as shown by the display of where she’s hitting, when she’s hitting, and for how long. I’d say watch it again, but it seems we’re on different sides of this issue and neither side seems to be convincing the other.

            I want to keep pointing out that I think Juicy does have the ability to make these transitions, and play a good ping-pong set, but this looks choreographed and faked.

    1. Nobody wants to be a guitarist anymore… but then again, even if you’re really good, if you’re not willing to sell out, you’re not going to make it as a DJ in today’s world… maybe that’s how DJs and guitarists are alike?

      1. that is true for every faction of music actually. my point really was that after 15+ years of FOH engineering for just about every style you can think of, i have found guitar players and dj’s to be the biggest whiners and pains in the ass.
        and btw, not to be a know-it-all, but fender outsells pioneer, NI and every other DJ company in the biz. by a huge margin at that. people still want to be guitarists :)

  21. And someone should point out that she’s a real fake!
    All her videos are shot with digital cameras, but as we all know, you can only use a digital camera if you know how to develop Super8 in your mum’s bathroom.
    Burn the witch!!!!

  22. OMG, 5 sec you get the fake ish on every move. It’s not even latency it’s just fake ass all teh way. How come she doesn’t feel ashamed. She’s moving hands over ish she does not control. Besides “what is a dj if he can’t scratch” she’s not even a controllerist. She can have 3.5 million fans, porn site stars have even more. so what’s the point. I’m suprised to see her on djworx when it’s April 6 and not 1st. Individuals like this devalorize the art of djing and the culture. 89% of youngsters watchin @ this don’t know ish bout what she’s supposed to execute to get the result you hear. Her bad musical taste is another topic. I just blame her for faking she’s doin some to the sound. The gear is not the point the point is she is no musician and that’s what a real dj is. This is so sad.

      1. god thanks iam not the only one who is scratching without trousers. she knows how to distract from her mediocre skill.
        would love to see a battle vs Tyra From Saigon

    1. Yes, you’re right. Your entire post was so sad – from grammar, to spelling, to content. I award you no points and may God have mercy on your soul

    1. Is… wait, what?

      Back on topic, that was a fun set. I liked the way she used what looks like a gate and filter effect on the rightmost deck to create rhythm.

  23. Cool beans, she having a blast . High 5 home slice .love all hard work and skills . If she was not super model beautiful. People would take her more seriously. Paris Hilton backlash effect maybe. Regardless she very talented and improvement can be heard ever year. I am now officially a Fan of herself.

  24. 1) A terrific routine and one that’s performed flawlessly. Major props to Juicy M for making great use of the unique features of the tablet and the software. IMO, personal music tastes are another issue but aren’t really relevant in evaluating her abilities.

    2) Yes, of course it’s rehearsed: EVERY DJ “routine” like this is rehearsed. It’s supposed to show a specific, rapid fire skill set rather than represent a 90 minute club set.

    3) She is absolutely, definitely NOT faking the routine. She’s playing it live. If you doubt that, you must be jealous.

    4) Anyone who’s judging this video negatively because she’s a woman will fortunately be left behind by evolution. The sooner the better.

    5) Four iPads probably cost about the same as couple of high CDJs.

  25. She’s a sick dj. If you’re pissed off because she probably gets a bit more attention than if she was male…. Deal with it. That’s life. We’re the male morons that like to see attractive women. :)

    Personally, not my kind of dj (more into house, long sets etc.) but looking at some of her other videos she’s bloody good at what she does.

  26. Ok, lets say your right and it’s fake. Just like Lip Sync… It’s DJ Sync.. and she’s off the HOOOOOOK good at it!!! I think it’s real…. Now like a good DJ producing, that was probably rehearsed for a week till she got it right. Practice, Practice, Practice….Isn’t that what they all say….

  27. It’s not to my taste. But faulting this for being a mainstream club routine is like faulting a techno set for not having lyrics or drops. What’s the point?

  28. Juicy M, there’s a reason you’ve been amassing views and it’s simply this is really good work. I’m not even very into this genre, but I really enjoyed watching and listening to your set. Keep it up. I look forward to buying a ticket to your show. Come to AZ. Cheers!

  29. I’d critique her on her over use of backspins, irritating effects, hard cuts, and her awful taste in music but I wouldn’t call the video a fake. The reflections, how they react to music being played or not, the reflection of her when she’s in front of or over a deck all point to a very well rehearsed routine. If it was fake, the detail of video editing done to make it would have been feature film quality editing.. I don’t see that happening from her team.. even if she has 3 million followers.

    Every woman behind the decks is a plus to me.

    Also.. I routinely don’t use headphones while practicing at home.. It helps develop this little thing DJs used to be aware of. “Fixing it in the mix.”

    1. Ezmyrelda, I agree with you. Too many irritating tricks in 8 minutes. But I will give her full marks for keeping four decks in sync without a sync button. For those who like that style/genre, great…

      I’d like to hear some of her longer sets to see if my “meh” reaction is due to too many tricks or her style in general.

  30. Moaning DJ’s are always complaining about turntables missing, sync, and no headphones…
    Same complaints since 15years…
    Come on guys, if you don’t have computers skills, ask the youth.
    And I don’t understand people that don’t like to try something new…

  31. My problem with using this equipment and with all touch screen crap gear like XDJs tablets etc.. is that you cant operate the gear without looking at it.

    Go watch a set from Juicy M where she is is using CDJs with Sync & Quantize engaged… at least she is looking up and engaging with her audience about 70% of her set. With touch screen devices you have to keep your eyes on the screen, and aim your finger accurately at the element you want to press. There is nothing tactile to grab so you can operate the gear and still engage with your audience.

    I don’t care if Juicy M typically uses sync and quantize in her other sets. I use sync so i can move faster when i play. I don’t care all her tracks are the exact same tempo from either re-editing or natural selection so she has completely eliminated the phase adjustment DJ skill from her performance. But using these devices has made this particular performance much less engaging with the audience then her other videos.

    I guess if you think looking at the top of her head is cool — then go go iPad DJ!!

    And just to be clear to all the people who don’t understand grid technology … including the writer Mark Settle (“who wish to throw sync button DJing at her, DJay Pro can sync all four decks inside a single iPad, but it cannot sync across devices”)

    … talking negatively about a DJ using “Sync” insinuating/defending that they are cheating/not cheating or have a lack of skill is not correct. Using sync is nothing but a “time saver” … 99% of the DJs performing have a digital display of their current BPM. All sync does is make the BPMs the same so you don’t have to spend 10-30 seconds matching the numbers on the player units. SYNC DOES NOT ELIMINATE A SKILL SET!!

    QUANTIZE is cheating… Not SYNC. Quantize eliminates the human error and removes the need for phase adjustment. If your going to give a DJ crap for using technology to make their performance easier… don’t rattle on about SYNC… thats not important… its Quantize that is the real cheat tool.

  32. Well she clearly payed her dues in the scratch/turntablist/dj way. Big up. I guess DJTT and DJworx will go offline now that she does everything they do, but better…

    Sorry haven’t watched the video

  33. The only problem I have with her is her taste in music and her annoying gesticulation

    I’ve got over the no decks, no headphones thing already. Worrying about it stops one from orgressing.

    Yes she’s a girl. Yes she’s fit. Yes she knows it. Yes she plays on it. I would if I were her! And you would too.

  34. I think she is great! Innovative, modern, provocative and fresh. Btw, didn’t Vekked won DMC last year without headphones as well? No headphones – so what? Cheers! S.

  35. Good article. I’ve known J for awhile and always hear people running their mouth about her videos, yet they can’t do half of it anyway. lol

  36. If you enjoy what you do and how do it and you can keep your crowd on the floor do what you and do worry about the next person. I have seen quite a few of J’s videos and I give her and all other DJ’s their props no matter what system their on. Haters just get your skills up, and if you stop hating on other DJ’s maybe one of them will help you to be a better DJ if you got that act right juice. Never hate, appreciate, educate, and reciprocate. That is what wrong with the world now everyone wants to keep everything to themselves or be better than the next person. Anyways, love the article. A lot of positive comments despite the negative one. Lets keep it fun DJ’s, one love..

  37. The vocal minority are those who hate this because of the quite stupid reasons you detail very well in the article.

    The reality is that the majority of DJs who dislike this dislike it not because of a lack of turntables, headphones or a penis but instead because of the complete lack of good taste in music. It’s just the same ear bleeding commercial EDM that’s spun by the DJ community’s favorite male punching bags: Aoki, Guetta, Hardwell, etc.

    DMC Champions aren’t awesome just because they have well practiced routines (like Juicy M) but because those routines are done while showcasing their brilliant taste in real music. Similarly, many great underground DJs have, in technical terms, pretty straightforward mixing skills but display skills that are less commercially acceptable, i.e., “sellable” within a 5 minute video like track selection, crowd reading and tempo/energy management.

  38. Must have rich parents to finance all this gear ! Look she is funny (annoying) but so are all new ….like back in the days Sex pistols ! She if fun to watch musik taste is not my fave but all you out there She has Spirit ! Looking forward to next video Jucy !

    1. Rich parents? Maybe she’s simply so determined and hard-working that her booking situation allows her to just buy 4 iPads for fun. If you take into account the traffic this video got, it’s well worth the expense.

  39. I’ve seen this set on U tube and was quite impressed.although i am a 2 year beginner/DJ . I have seen other video or Juicy M and I see a lot of good energy, beauty ,and talent! I seriously don’t under stand why some would be intimidated , Unless they are afraid they have something to lose! -DJMJ-

  40. I can’t stand EDM so I only made it as far as the horrible dubstep beat kicking in, but I can safely say: It’s not fake. It’s cool that someone took the time to actually do a mix with this configuration (to use headphones – which you would if you weren’t playing a set playlist – you simply plug them into the mixer). I’d like to see this done with decent music. It’s possible that a future DJ app will come out that allows you to link iPads and pull music from a shared USB drive. But now that more and more controllers are featuring built-in screens, I don’t really see the point of using expensive tablets.

  41. Reading the comments wants to make me gauge my eyes out…Who gives a honk.. She’s got skills, she is pretty and young and ‘doing a Paris’ by flogging the EDM scene for all its worth. As found with many youngsters she has a terrible taste in music maybe that will change. I quite liked the set and could not see any faking, I reckon it took a few takes though…practice makes technical execution perfect…

  42. Fresh mix, not sure why people are hating: it’s obviously not fake….. if you think it’s fake then you daresay have shite skills and can’t see what’s going on.