Panasonic Black Technics SL-1210GR turntables (1)

Back in black: the DJ’s favourite Technics SL-1210GR

Panasonic Black Technics SL-1210GR turntables (1)

It’s Sunday, a day when I traditionally don’t post anything because you’ve all got something much better to do that read the drivel I post, and to be honest so have I. But when something Technicsy arrives, I pretty much don my editor’s hat (there is no hat), put some trousers on, and write some flippant words. So just another normal DJWORX day then.

But there really isn’t much to write — the headline is the story, and everything else is known. It’s a SL-1200GR, but in black, making it a SL-1210GR. That’s it. Everything is the same, including the price. Just like the good old days. But there are reams of words for you to pour over:

Technics today unveiled the new Grand Class SL-1210GR (black) Direct-Drive Turntable System, joining the SL1200GR (silver) edition that was announced earlier this year. Both models inherit state-of-the- art technology from SL-1200G, which was developed as a reference direct-drive turntable for the next generation. On top of these legendary features, the latest models offer new materials and technical design, enabling stunning sound quality for a wider group of audio enthusiasts.

Technics’ SL-1200G has been an iconic turntable and first choice for generations of vinyl fans. While being celebrated for its sound quality, it is also renowned for its flexibility and robustness. The incarnation of this legendary turntable, the SL-1200GR (silver) and SL-1210GR (black), will be available from April 2017 onwards. As customers have come to expect from Technics, the SL-1200GR and SL-1210GR models make no compromise on sound quality. At the same time, these newcomers also provide all the functions that made their iconic predecessor so popular among DJs: its durability, shock resistance, reliable direct drive and adjustable rotation speed. The latest models also come with new materials and a novel overall technical design. “The SL-1200GR and SL-1210GR combine the best of both worlds,” says Michiko Ogawa, Director Technics at Panasonic. “We are sure both models will fulfill the expectations of Technics fans around the globe. Our objective was to extend our top range for audio enthusiasts as well as professional DJs.”

Fusing Technics’ Traditional Analogue and Leading-edge Digital Technologies 

Launched in 2016, the SL-1200G combined Technics‘ traditional analogue technology and advanced digital technology. Its outstanding performance literally rocked the hi-fi market and redefined the reference for direct-drive turntables.

Parts from the SL-1200G were newly developed to create the SL-1200GR and the SL-1210GR, such as the coreless direct-drive motor and precise motor control technology, high-rigidity platter and high-sensitivity tonearm. This ensures audio enthusiasts using the SL-1200GR/SL-1210GR can enjoy music with the rich, robust sound of analogue records.

Coreless Direct-Drive Motor Achieving Stable Rotation

Unlike belt-drive and other systems, direct-drive systems rotate the motor at low speed and directly drive the platter. This concept provides numerous advantages, such as the almost complete absence of degradation in S/N ratio due to motor vibration and deceleration mechanisms, as well as high reliability over a long period of time because of not requiring parts replacement.

In 2016, Technics developed the twin-rotor, surface-facing, coreless direct-drive motor with rotor magnets placed on both sides, eliminating the rotation irregularity of the motor, referred to as “cogging,” which was a unique issue for direct-drive systems. This motor was adopted for the SL-1200G, which once again drew a significant response in the hi-fi market. The SL-1200GR/SL-1210GR inherits the same design philosophy with the new development of a single-rotor, surface-facing, coreless direct-drive motor, resulting in the elimination of cogging.

The SL-1200GR/SL-1210GR’s rotation control, which verifies and corrects the precision of the motor, uses the latest motor control technology cultivated in the development of Blu-ray devices, just as that used by the SL-1200G. In addition, the electrical circuitry has been tuned to ensure the newly developed motor of the SL-1200GR/SL-1210GR achieves maximum performance.

Turntable Platter —Pursuing Rigidity and Vibration Damping Characteristics 

The platter achieves high-rigidity and vibration-damping characteristics by using a two-layer construction with deadening rubber applied to the entire rear surface of the aluminum die-cast. This eliminates the unnecessary resonance that is otherwise relayed to the record, thereby producing clear sound.

To increase the inertial mass and to reduce vibration, the shape of the aluminum die-cast portion was optimised by simulation. At 2.5kg (including the rubber mat), the SL-1200GR/SL-1210GR platter is 0.8kg heavier than that of the previous SL-1200MK5. Also, the back surface of the platter features strengthening ribs to improve rigidity. Increasing the surface area of contact with the deadening rubber achieves damping characteristics that are more than twice as good as those of the SL-1200MK5.

Tonearm Achieving High Initial-Motion Sensitivity 

The tonearm tracks the rotation of the record and enables reading with high precision. The tonearm inherited by Technics is the traditionally used static-balance universal S-shaped tonearm, employing an aluminum pipe with excellent light weight and rigidity for the material of the tonearm pipe.

With its gimbal suspension construction, the tonearm bearing section of the SL-1200GR/SL-1210GR uses a cut-processed housing that employs high-precision bearings, as in the SL-1200G. The high initial-motion sensitivity of 5mg or less is achieved through manual assembly and adjustment by skilled Japanese artisans. This enables the grooves etched into the records to be accurately traced.

Gold-plated phono terminals and ground terminals for detachable cables are provided below the tonearm, so a wide variety of cables can be selected. Also, the use of metal shielding construction inside the case reduces the effects of external noise.

High-rigidity Body and High-damping Silicon Insulators for Beautiful Sound and Isolation from Various Vibrations

The SL-1200GR/SL-1210GR ensures high-rigidity by using a body with a two-layered construction solidly unifying the BMC and the aluminum die-cast chassis.
For the insulators supporting the body, as with the SL-1200G, the SL-1200GR/SL-1210GR uses special silicon rubber that ensures both high vibration damping characteristics and long-term reliability. Vibration in the horizontal direction is absorbed by reinforcement with cylindrical tubes using microcell polymers. While inheriting the technology of the SL-1200G, the insulators have been modified to specifically suit the characteristics of the SL-1200GR/SL-1210GR.

SL-1200GR/SL-1210GR Specifications

Technology for Rotational Stability

  • Coreless Direct Drive Motor
  • High-Precision Motor Controller

Construction for Vibration Tolerance

  • High-dampening Turntable Platter
  • Rigid Cabinet Construction
  • Silicon Rubber Insulator

High Quality Parts

  • High Sensitive Tonearm
  • Gold–plated Detachable Terminals

Technics Definitive Design

Inherited SL-1200 Series

Turntable Section

  • Type: Direct Drive Manual Turntable
  • Turntable Speeds: 33 1/3, 45, 78 r/min
  • Adjust Range: ±8%, ±16%
  • Starting Torque: 2.2 kg・cm (1.91 lb-in)
  • Build-up Characteristics: 0.7 s. from standstill to 33 1/3 r/min
  • Wow and Flutter: 0.025%W.R.M.S.
  • Rumble: 78dB(IEC 98A Weighted)
  • Turntable Platter: Aluminum die-cast
  • Diameter:332mm (13-5/64″)
  • Weight:Approx. 2.5kg (5.5 lb) (Including rubber sheet)

Tonearm Section

  • Type: Universal, Static Balance
  • Effective Length: 230mm (9-1/16″)
  • Overhang: 15mm (19/32″)
  • Tracking Error Angle:
    Within 2° 32′(at the outer groove of 30cm (12″) record)
  • Within 0° 32′(at the inner groove of 30cm (12″) record)
  • Offset Angle: 22°
  • Arm Height Adjustment Range: 0 – 6mm
  • Stylus Pressure Adjustment Range: 0 – 4g (Direct Reading)
  • Head Shell Weight: Approx. 7.6g
  • Applicable Cartridge Weight Range: [without auxiliary weight] 5.6 – 12.0g (14.3 – 20.7g (including head shell))
    [with auxiliary weight] 10.0 – 16.4g (18.7 – 25.1g (including head shell))
  • Cartridge Mounting Dimension: JIS 12.7mm, interval
  • Head Shell Terminal Lug: 1.2mmφ 4-pin terminal lug

Terminals

  • Audio Output: PHONO (Pin Jack) x 1, EARTH TERMINAL x 1

General

  • Power Supply: AC120 V, 60 Hz
  • Power Consumption: 11 W (Approx. 0.2W (Standby))
  • Dimensions (W x H x D): 453 x 173 x 372 mm (17-27/32 × 6-13/16 × 14-21/32 inch)
  • Weight: Approx. 11.2kg (Approx. 24.7lbs)

Panasonic Black Technics SL-1210GR turntables (2)

And that’s your lot. Had this news come out on a weekday, perhaps I might have spent a little longer on the verbiage. But essentially, a shiny black £1300 SL-1210GR has been released, and having been here a number of times before, that’ll do for a Sunday. Back to your Sunday lunches and other non-DJ activities. Normal services resume tomorrow.

The Old Owner
  1. 1300 pounds?
    400pounds gets me Reloop RP8000 which, with sorbethane tonearm, has better performance then Technics, and has midi which no other TT has.
    I mean………c’mmon

    1. performance wise better quality wise lesser

      would i want this 1210 cheaper?.. of course 799 would be great.. but i know when you look at the specifications and build quality that no China made turntable can ever beat the 1210

          1. off the top of my head… M5G: 16% pitch. PDX3000: MIDI pitch control, ultrapitch (60% total), torque control, brake adjust, reverse. TTX-AT: 50% pitch, torque control, display, exchangeable tonearms, switchable fader position, start/stop adjust, 2 start/stop buttons. STR8-180: 50% pitch, absolute tank, high torque, start/stop adjust, 2 start/stop buttons, reverse. RP8000 straight: 50% pitch, RP8000 bugs fixed, solid deck overall, has browsing controls and MIDI pads if you need them (I personally don’t care).

            1210GR: yay 8% pitch. ricebagfallingoverinchina.gif

            1. Khm, have you noticed the x2 button above the pitch on the new Technics? It’s 16%. If you press 78 you cover the 50% range of 33 and 45 rpm. Interesting, no?
              GR has torque and brake adjust under the platter.
              Display is useless. Like the “clip” mark on DJM Nexus2 mixer.
              Exchangeable arm? Just angle the cart in your headshell and you go from s to straight.
              Midi buttons can be purchased separately IF you need them.

              1. It’s too early to do complex maths but here goes:

                78rpm pitched down to -16% = 65.52rpm = minimum -96.56% pitch on a 33rpm record

                SP this clearly does not work for 50% pitch. However…

                45rpm pitched down to -16% = 37.8rpm = -13.4% on a 33rpm record

                45rpm pitched up to +16% = 52.2rpm = +56.6% on a 33rpm record

                This gives you an effective pitch range of -13 to +56%. But it does mean that you have to play your track at 45rpm to start with, and really doesn’t make for smooth transitions on big pitch changes. It’s a workaround, and not really close to the ease of use or accuracy of +/-50% on 33rpm.

                To address your other points:

                Torque and brake adjust under a platter is hardly useful mid-set. I haven’t been able to find a torque adjustment spec anyway, but with a startup torque of a 1200GR of a full half of a super OEM, I doubt the new Technics will adjust anywhere near to what super OEM users have. Once you have 4.7kg startup, it’s hard to go back.

                Have to disagree on displays too. Working on a set and being able to remember actual pitch figures is wonderful. I don’t have to guess and adjust anymore. I simply have more information at hand on my turntable. This is a good thing.

                Straight arms — love them. We can argue about the finer points of angling, needle types, and whatnot. But after almost a decade and a half of TTX straight arms without angled carts, with no skipping and no discernible increase in record wear or deterioration in sound quality, that’s as much as I care to get into it. My setup works as I want it to.

                @guest100 and @disqus_ORNUkiK3xA:disqus

                Being a Technics evangelist is fine, but it doesn’t make you right or wrong. Ray has his opinions, I have mine, and you have yours. But they are opinions — we are entitled to them, and speak from our mutual experiences.

                But you cannot argue against our personal experiences, because it has been gained through years of trial and error. Both Ray and myself have specific needs that cannot be addressed by using Technics. And even if they do last centuries, and have low wow and flutter specs, they simply do not do what we need them to.

                Bottom line — Technics are superb quality iconic turntables, but they do not work for every DJ, no matter how long they last or how accurate the motor is. It really is that simple. And costing 3 x as much as our personal preferences just makes them even less suitable.

                1. Yes, there is a gap between 52-65 bpm on a 45 record, only the higher end of 50% pitch is achievable via the 78 -16%, didn’t put that well.

                  Respecting your other arguments and experience I find those aspects of use extremely specific to become standard features of just every turntable, so not having them on the GR does not make it handicapped as some want to see it. The core tt characteristics on the Technics are far superior and that can not be overshadowed by the oem bells and whistles. It is just fine if one want’s to sacrifice W&F for a, say, straight arm or 50% pitch, but I know I wouldn’t. It’s good to have choices.
                  ps You are wrong on the wear and straight arm. It is much increased and that’s proven. Not important for timecode but it’s plain pity to play traditional vinyl with such arm, if you care about it.

            2. 1210GR is 16% pitch + 78rpm

              you dont care about quality as long as it has as many bells and wistles as possible wich most DJs dont even use.

              i never see any DJ use 50% pitch apart from a handful of scratch nerds

    1. Have you tried the new generation Technics, yet?

      While you’re obviously right about the price, I’m not sure if there are superior decks. Build quality should be way above the Hanpin decks (and maybe Denon, too) and I do not care about features. If I didn’t have M5Gs already, I’d be tempted to buy these.

        1. ignorance serves you.

          At least i tried all and purchased most decks you mentioned at some period and i can tell by experience on the job that they failed except for the M5G.

        2. Feature-wise that might be true.
          If you rely on certain Vestax features, Technics doesn’t serve you well.

          Everyone has different demands / use cases.

  2. I think these are slick. But i’m not getting rid of my old 1200’s. No need to.. If these had like midi or some other cool feature I might be tempted. But I don’t even spin vinyl anymore. Too bad they didn’t incorporate that kickstarter ida of putting a display where the 45 adapter goes. And it would also be nice to buy them WITHOUT the dustcover.

  3. The same people complaining about the price of these will GLADLY spend $2400 on a Pio CDJ that isn’t EVEN a CDJ. NO MOVING PARTS and they crap out after 3 or 4 years. I’ll take my chances with these if I NEED to. My 20+ year old 1200’s STILL work just fine.

        1. wow flutter and signal noise ratio are key factors on wich you can rate the quality of a turntable

          when you look at those ATLP120 decks that look like 1200s you will quickly find out its a plastic clone with bad specifications

          1. I had another version of that lower end Hanpin OEM base DJ-3560 (Reloop RP-4000). As long as I didn’t mix on a Technics, they were ok. But as soon as I first touched a 1210, I was spoiled. Yes, you can mix with the cheaper decks – BUT it definitely is more fun with decent ones.

  4. Well looks like technics have seen a massive sales drop on their ridiculously priced grand class versions and now are trying to tap the dj market that they turned their back on when they revived the 1200 brand

    1. GAE is sold out.

      G is on the market about 2 months, not even distributed well yet.

      People should be thankful that Technics brought back the 1200. Now you can save up and buy serious quality. Without Technics you were left to some unfinished low quality overpriced copies and unrealistic second hand market.

  5. The engineering on these beauties is unrivalled. Theres a video on Youtube on how they designed these decks. If you’ve seen that, you cannot with a straigh face say that there are better quality decks out there.
    And there is more to a Technics than features. They never were about features. You want midi, phono amps, switchable tonearms, finger bleeding torque, go to a competitor product. But the Technics is just like all those boutique rotary mixers that are being released lately. Very basic, but uncompromising on quality.
    It is a feeling. I agree, if you are buying a turntable as a DJ purely rational, you’d buy a new Reloop with all its fancy features. But this is just beyond rational choice. Look at it, feel it, use it. The feeling a Technics has doesn’t compare to a super OEM. And the price is very reasonable, it is a high end audio product.

    1. The video you refer to is manufacturing process, rather than design. Between the cartridge and the RCAs is the same material, so as far as sound goes, there is no real difference to the ear between Technics and the Super OEMs. Then theres the motor which may or may not have more or less torque than Technics, and lets face it there are enough decks out there to take your hands off torque wise, i will kepp my 12x 1200s 4x1210s and Various pairs of Vestax, Stanton and Pioneers, as far as im concerned Technics lost a big chunk of the market.

      And for all the people who signed the petition to get Technics back, out of that list how many bought anew 1200GAE or would buy a 1200G after the recent smack talk from Technics,

      1. high torgue was a technics invention
        you forgot to mention that over 90% of super OEM come out of factory with lose tonearms

        the petition never begged for prices of $4000 hence the 1210GR is coming

  6. I think price is now not for djs…its up to hi-fi guys….because i can have a pair of used MK5G for less then a half of this single one….and theres Stanton Str8-150