Pioneer XDJ-RX rekordbox controller review (24)

FIRST LOOK: 60 minutes with the Pioneer XDJ-RX

Pioneer XDJ-RX rekordbox controller review (24)

So I’m down at Pioneer’s media lab in London yesterday morning. And while at a loose end, I was placed in front of the all new XDJ-RX all-in-one rekordbox controller and left alone for about an hour for some private time with it. Of course, I’m morally obligated to have a bash around, and of course write some words before somebody else in team DJWORX gets to review the hell out of it as only we do.

So what follows is not a concise warts and all account, but more initial feelings and rambling unconnected musings, which I’m writing on the fly, and tidying up a little when back home (as I am right now). There are omissions, because 60 minutes only gives you so much time to play, but for a broad view, this article works.

Pioneer XDJ-RX rekordbox controller review (15)

FIRST IMPRESSIONS

This is Pioneer disconnected from the world of everyone else’s software. It’s pure Pioneer without concession to Serato, and my gut says it’ll always be that way as well. No rubber performance pads, no familiar software-driven controls — just a familiar CDJ/DJM focussed workflow.

The asymmetrical layout is pure Pioneer, as if glue was applied to a pair of mid-range CDJs and a two channel DJM. Plenty of space around everything making it easy to use, even if I do have to get my head around a non-software workflow. The brain gets used to things such as 2×4 pads, and when they’re absent, it jars a little. No worries — I was soon in the flow.

Construction wise, it’s more CDJ that DJM. The XDJ-RX is fairly lightweight, has a plastic chassis finished off with brushed metal faceplates, and complimented with hard plastic buttons and fader caps. The knobs are rubberised though, and perhaps even the edge of the jog wheels too. It’s also quite large for a two channel controller but the screen does rather dictate the overall size. I doubt however that a four channel version would fit in this frame.

Pioneer XDJ-RX rekordbox controller review (22)

THE SCREEN

Having played with the XDJ-1000, it looks to be the same one (albeit not a touch screen), but offers two lots of waveforms along with assorted information to help you mix music. I wish the screen was retina, but I figure that will come in time — you don’t shoot your load on V1, especially if the concept of all-in-ones is still unproven. I also wish it has a higher frame rate — the waveforms are a bit jumpy when scrolling, even at maximum zoom. We can only hope for a 60fps retina screen.

But it is logically laid out. It’s a split screen, with zooming waveforms (50 shades of blue) at the top, and full waveforms at the bottom. The four available cues show up in ABCD order on the full waveform, as well as on the zoomed one, which incidentally has five levels of zoom.

Overall, the screen is well implemented. I’m sure with more time, I could pull it to bits, but first impressions count, and mine are good.

Pioneer XDJ-RX rekordbox controller review (19)

THE JOG WHEELS

Let’s be clear — the Serato driven DDJ controller jogs could be better. Thankfully, the XDJ-RX wheels are excellent. Because it’s all hardware driven, there’s zero latency, zero artefacts with slow drags, and the accuracy is excellent. There’s no brake that I can see, but there is a touch sensitivity control. They’re relatively free-wheeling and lack the rattly CDJ feel, and pull off spin-backs with just a hint of braking. I approached the wheels expecting another DDJ let-down, but the XDJ-RX jogs are exactly as jogs should be.

Pioneer XDJ-RX rekordbox controller review (17)

THE MIXER SECTION

There’s nothing outstanding to report here — two channels, with a 45mm smooth crossfader with a curve switch, and 45mm line faders that are a little stiffer, you know… you how mix DJs like them. There’s three band EQ, with menu switchable full kill isolator mode or -26dB EQ mode for just a little more control. The sound is excellent – crisp and clear.

The channels are switchable between internal mode and line/phono inputs too. It’s at this point that I once again ponder the possibility of Rekordbox becoming a full standalone DJ software solution, as I can’t think why you’d want to plug turntables, let alone CDJs into this, if only because much of the appeal of the XDJ-RX is rendered useless.

Pioneer XDJ-RX rekordbox controller review (12)

Pioneer XDJ-RX rekordbox controller review (13)

THE EFFECTS

THE XDJ-RX has two types of effects:

Colour effects: These are drop-ins on the channels. You get a single parameter control, and you can apply one colour effect at a time, but it’s the same effect if you use it on both channels. This is where the filter lives,

Channel effects: You get a handful of classics plus some new fun effects as well. Again, this is one effect to different sources, and has more controls too.

Another niggle — the effects on/off button is always on. So even if effects are off, the light is on. When the effects are on, the button flashes. I feel that I would have preferred button off and button on.

So while you don’t get the full menu of Serato’s complex effects offering, you do get a small selection, that should give you more than enough to play with, especially for the potential typical user of the XDJ-RX.

Pioneer XDJ-RX rekordbox controller review (18)

PAD FUNCTIONS

Having established that the plethora of Serato goodies isn’t on this unit, Pioneer DJ has still added some spice of its own. Hot cues work exactly as you might expect, auto beat loop does too, and there’s an attempt at slice that I haven’t had time to figure out yet. I’m sure a flick through the manual will sort it out for me, it seems to work as other slicers do, but with perhaps a few quirks.

One little annoyance – if you engage auto beat loop and then switch modes, it stays engaged. I would have liked the button to have remained lit to confirm that I’ve still got a loop running.

Pioneer XDJ-RX rekordbox controller review (23)

SUMMING UP

I got an hour unsupervised to play, shoot, and write, so please don’t take this stilted stream of consciousness to be a complete review — that will come. But my first impressions are very good. Breaking free from the slavedom of external software, Pioneer DJ is able to express their own way of DJing, one that is familiar to a huge number of existing users, and also shows that tethered controllers aren’t the be all and end all of technology.

In the hour of playing, I didn’t once wish for a laptop screen. I didn’t miss all that stuff and fluff allegedly designed to make my DJ life easier, and was instead left to fend for myself (relatively speaking of course) and make the most of the small window and perceived lack of features. But my character trait of doing more with less kicked in big time. I was more focussed on mixing music with the features I had in front of me, and absolutely did not miss the often crippling choice of bells, whistles, and gizmos so frequently served up in software these days. I had two decks, a small screen, and a handful of cool effects. And it was good.

Thus my first impression of the XDJ-RX is this — even without plugging it into the rekordbox workflow, the standalone USB based operation is excellent, and with the handful of features that are included, the XDJ-RX delivers a very focussed performance. I can only imagine how this experience will improve when used with rekordbox.

A full review is forthcoming, and we’ll have it in your hands as soon as is humanly possible. In the meantime, if this helps you make a buying decision, then my work here is done.

FOOTNOTES

  1. For those interested, the monitor stands in the bottom picture are from Ardan.
  2. The final XDJ-RX will have the Pioneer DJ logo on it, with the notoriously large space between Pioneer and DJ removed. Yay.

GALLERY

The Old Owner
  1. Excellent article. Please ask when Pioneer will incorporate (the free) FLAC. The XDJ-RX looks great and does seem like the nextlevelness that we’re looking for. Add two decks (for four total) with a sampler and my beloved S4 is toast.

    1. like others – I’d really like to know how the track analysis performs. add an aux channel in that can have the mixer effects applied (so that one of the mixer channels isn’t sacrificed) and an out to bpm sync external devices like a kaossilator or a TR-8. then I would be willing to do the prep in Recordbox and slowly move away from Traktor. maybe.

  2. The only thing holding me back from getting this is the file limit, yes 10000 files is alot of music, but unless uncapping the limit cripples the usability of the RX, i don’t see why you would limit it atleast in that regard. Maybe pioneer will reconsider and remove the cap in a firmware update. Other then that this is an amazing V.1.

      1. This again?!??! Look, for a mobile DJ who is doing weddings/etc, the Pioneer gear has ALWAYS been inappropriate for internal stuff, which is why there was always the HID control option. This is not for the DJ who is making their living as an “everything DJ”. This is for the guy who is DJing in a club and wanting to have a system that gives them a reasonable approximation of the club setup, where you are usually bringing a more curated set to the spot.

          1. This is so obviously primarily aimed for DJs to have a set up at home that allows them to be Rekordbox only DJs on a budget and still play clubs. When Professorbx says club DJ that is what he is talking about. This allows people that play in clubs to not have to spend $6,000 on CDJ2000’s and a DJM900 and still be able to have the same workflow while practicing at home or playing in a club. Thus removing another barrier from a transition to Rekordbox.

            That being said the idea behind Rekordboxbox is to be able to prepare for your gig beforehand and play the gig without a laptop. Even if you are doing weddings if you can’t do that with 10,000 tracks there is something very wrong. It is a different way of doing things, but that is what Rekordbox was designed to do, not duplicate DVS where you have to bring a laptop. If that different way doesn’t work for some people it just means this isn’t the controller for them.

            However if you want to have more than 10,000 files working with the RX I believe you can. You just have to have them on your laptop running Rekordbox instead of on a portable USB Flash drive or HDD and connect via the RX’s LAN port on the back from what I understand.And if you truly need to carry around over 10,000 tracks, you probably want a laptop screen and keyboard to navigate your collection anyways.

            1. I was going to reply to GroovinDJ, but you sort of took the words out of my mouth. :) Its a product that is targeted toward people who want to have a basic approximation of the club setup without dropping the cash needed for 2 CDJ’s and a Pioneer mixer.

              When I was working on the SCS.4DJ, the limit was twice that for track count, and yet the same attacks were leveled against it. The whole 20k track count ceiling came from my DJ collection, which included pretty much every promo only track for ten years, hits going back to the 60’s, and a hip hop collection that is sort of bottomless. I’ve DJ’d clubs, weddings, house parties, corporate events, etc, and never had an issue. There comes a point where you are going to reach the ceiling of being able to know your collection, and are just collecting random tracks to be able to fill every possible song request, and, frankly as a DJ your job should also be gatekeeper, stopping the random requests from ruining a party. As well, if you think about a MINIMUM of 1.5 minutes spent per track to check your beat grids, drop in a couple appropriate cue points and tag correctly (this is if it takes 1.5 minutes per track max, and you are able to do this back to back with no lag) you are looking at 10.4 DAYS to prep said 10k tracks. This is also assuming you take no time to eat, sleep, go to the bathroom, etc. You could then use the argument of “When I was on records/CD’s I wasn’t tagging or dropping in cue points”, but you were filing your CD’s/putting notes on your records, sorting your collection, etc, making the amount of time spent about equal. At the end of the day, sorry, it makes so little sense it isn’t even funny.

                1. Yup. And, frankly, most brides and dads are smart enough to list out their songs that will be required for important parts months and months in advance. Plenty of time to get those songs saved on a drive.

  3. did you bring a drive with your music on it?
    or mi with theirs? i’m asking because, song analyzing efficiency will quickly decide the success of this. :)
    the dmc starts in two weeks, guys, get someone in it with this controller :) -great free advertising

    1. Songs are analyzed with Rekordbox-it isn’t like other systems where you can analyze on-unit. It will play songs but doesn’t give you as much (don’t get the beat gridding/playlist making/etc). On the other hand, you can use Rekordbox on iOS or Android devices, including all the prep work with hot cues, grids, etc instead of using a thumb drive, making the lack of on-board analysis WAY less of an issue.

      1. oh, I see. you shouldn’t tell me this stuff, cause now I want one just so I can learn to use rekordbox (which, seems to be the reason anyone would want one)

        1. Rekordbox is a cool concept. It makes prepping a bit more convenient in a lot of ways, as you don’t need your laptop. I’ve never been a big fan of the thumb drive concept, but being able to use your phone (or, for that matter, an iPod touch or iPad) for prep work is super convenient.

    1. Most (all?) Pioneer controllers have plastic chassis. I don’t see that changing. The screen resolution is more than fine. If the unit appeals now, don’t wait for v2. Retina resolution isn’t going to make this any more usable – just prettier.

  4. What the market is missing is a high end two channel controller with a good hardware mixer part (meaning that only the decks function as midi control, the mixer as hardware only processing the signal with a detailed level control ect.). Mobile laptop DJ’s are looking for portable quality with a reasonable weight, not maximum effects. If you work allone, you don’t wanna drag a CDJ set or SZ around. But the “midi-only” mixer section of most small sized gear is crap. How to work on a mixer that only shows the 0DB and -6DB with nothing in between? But (software-) market leaders don’t seem to support the idea. Sad that the corporate interest besides large scale club and festival DJ’s, is further focussed on the bedroom DJ mass holliday sales.

  5. Have you used the jogs on a sz. no lag and amazing so not sure what you mean with ddj jogs. my sz has no latency at all and tension controls for back spins and such. mmmm

  6. I’m sure you already know this but the Pioneer EFX button being lit when not engaged and blinking when in use has been the case on every Pioneer mixer since the 500, almost 20 years ago (damn, I’m feeling old when I say that). It is also the case for engaging EFX buttons on the EFX500/1000 and RMX500/1000, as well as the cue/play buttons on CDJs. They are lit when not in use and blink when in use.

    I think they did it right. Having the button be dark when not in use would be much worse in dark DJ booths.

    1. I didn’t know that. I’ve only just got an old EFX in for testing return loops, and I’ve got no other Pioneer gear in-house with such buttons. So I’ve learned something today, but still don’t agree with it. Off means off and on means on. On doesn’t mean off or flashing mean on. I’m sure it’s been fine for all this time though so who am I to complain now?

  7. This looks great. I’ve been waiting for some time to see a piece of DJ equipment that does away with laptops in a convincing way and leaves all the boring stuff like track preparation for offline time on a PC and allowing the focus to be on the best bits of digital DJing while using the hardware. This looks like that unit. It also feels like (and indeed is) a complete DJ system rather than merely a chunky software controller that has all the brain power sitting elsewhere. It looks the part in a way that other all-in-ones tend not to. Unfortunately, I don’t have a spare £1200 so I guess I’ll have to gaze admiringly from a distance.

  8. Thanks Mark for the quick review and first thoughts, good to know about the jog wheels as thats the one thing I have been wondering about, it’s a unit I and a few have taken a key interest in my only issue is with the price, I mean £1100 is a huge amount for a system that basically I could put together a setup of 2x Denon SC2900 (which are excellent decks) and a 2 channel mixer and still have change. Ok you won’t get the whole pioneer thing but I feel this is the one areas that will let this unit down, which is a shame but hey it is pioneer and to hell with the price :)

  9. I’m surprised with your statement regarding the ddj jog wheels.
    I have the SX2 and don’t feel any sort of lag at all on the jogs.
    Weren’t the SX2 jogs upgraded? I’m not a scratch dj, but I do use the jog’s a lot and coming from turntables, I would definitely notice if they were bad, please elaborate.

    1. I can only speak to my experiences on the SR and SX, and to a degree the SZ. I found the RX jogs to be superior to the others – incredibly smooth, instant response and absolutely zero latency. I’d go as far to say that the RX jogs are some of the nicest I’ve played with.

      1. There were a bunch of tweaks to the jog wheel release in SDJ with the release of the SX2-its still not perfect, but it isn’t nearly as laggy as the SX was at launch.

          1. Could be better, not awful. The release of the platter still feels a TINY bit weird, but when you are actually moving the platter it is alright. The Vestax platters are still the gold standard, followed incredibly close by Numark and Reloop.

              1. My VCI380, though response wise the 400 and 300 feel the same (though with different physical feel due to differences in size and/or tension control). I’m strictly talking about response in software to movements however.

      1. The question I’ve been trying to figure out is whether this works *without* rekordbox as the CDJs do. I’ll use rkb but need to be able to use non-rkb USB as well.

  10. I was testing one for a week last week and have to disagree on a number of the points listed (esp the jogs!)… without being to harsh, the test unit was ‘buggy’ and felt like there will need to be a few revisions to the firmware before launch to iron out. Loved the USB interface tho and freedom of not being attached to a laptop! K

    1. This is why I state this isn’t a review, and an hour isn’t anywhere near enough time to formulate a solid and lasting opinion. I imagine that there are different units in different conditions all over the world right now.

      I know that at these late stages, there can be furious activity to nail last minute bugs and do some final performance tweaks.

    1. I can’t, and unfortunately I don’t think anyone else can either, because the XDJ-RX isn’t compatible with Serato Software — it is designed with Pioneer Rekordbox in mind. You can use it with Traktor though through a MIDI map file though.

  11. Hello, what is the name or model number of the monitor stands? I see these in a lot of pioneer DJ videos, where can I get a pair?

    Thanks
    DJ Shon