Beginner vs Pro DJ gear

Beginner vs Pro DJ gear

Beginner vs Pro DJ gear

Last week, we saw adversarial giants of the DJ world take aim at the rapidly growing entry level DJ market – Pioneer with their DDJ-WeGO and Denon DJ’s MC2000. Both are better know for their high end pro level offerings, but the market is such that the real fun is happening far lower down the DJ evolutionary scale.

Entry level however is a fluid term these days, as the craving for features is stronger than ever, thus you’ll find buttons on each unit that were unheard of just a few years ago. Entry level used to mean lower quality and less features. If we take Numark’s DJ in a Box as an example – this used to shift in ridiculous quantities back in the day, and could do little more than mix one record to another. Nobody had any expectations that you’d be able to do little more than that, nor did anyone have expectations of it lasting very long either.

Beginner vs Pro DJ gear
How many top DJs started out on Numark’s DJ In A Box?

But times have changed, and even beginners have huge expectations of being able to emulate their superstar DJ idols, for little more than a few hundred notes. And it’s not hard to see why – those previously mentioned buttons such  as loops, cues and samples are more or less standard on  what is classed as beginners gear. In times past, you were lucky to get EQs on the mixer, let alone anything as luxurious as fader curve control.

If we were to try to emulate the barebones basics of DJing, then you’re looking at units like Numark’s DJ2GO or Gemini’s FirstMix. Now I know what many of you are immediately are saying – cheap plastic toys not suitable for pros. But anyone who calls themselves a DJ should be able to rock a party with them. These units go for a handful of peanuts in real terms – a mere fraction of the gear that is now classed as entry level. So why is a new line being drawn somewhere above the basics that beginners really should nail first?

DJ Feature Creep
Feature creep – “the misguided notion that somehow more is always better”

It’s called feature creep – the constant tinkering and adding of features that go unnecessarily beyond the basics. Generally it’s the cool stuff that keeps getting added – hit a button or twist a knob and something funky happens. It’s dead easy to smack a sample button and get an airhorn, or to twist a knob and hear your music disappear up its own arse in a reverb nightmare. We seasoned pros think it sounds terrible, but the noob loves it. And there’s every chance that while they’re doing this that they have no idea about song structure, or how to use EQs to get a smooth mix.

Let’s take an imaginary noob DJ called for argument’s sake Mark. He’s seen his favourite DJs on MTV and wants to be just like them. He puts on his best “aw but muuum” whine, steadily breaks down his parents’ resistance, who then trot off to their nearest DJ boutique in search of the latest beginner shiny (this worked for me with skateboards). What they’ll be confronted with is “beginners” gear that confusingly has the feature set of considerably more expensive gear. Do beginners need effects? Samples? Loops? No of course not. But do they want them? Of course – everyone wants the bells and whistles, even if they can get in the way of learning the basics first. Yay – Mark can now twist a filter knob and sound just like Guetta, even if he has no idea what a filter actually is. Somehow, I still couldn’t skate like Tony Alva.

Beginner vs Pro DJ gear
Whatever the level, a sync button is a standard feature.

Beginner vs Pro DJ gear – Sync

But perhaps the basics are becoming irrelevant. Sync will automate the mindless task of beatmatching, but will not achieve the highly skilled craft of mixing. Modern digital audio tech means you can redline your audio but it still doesn’t distort. That’s a couple of DJ foundations covered right there. It’s something that new DJs don’t need to learn anymore. So what’s left? The bells and whistles I guess, which when you look beyond the utilitarian features with a steep learning curve are just plain sexy and offer instant engagement and gratification.

So you understand my frustration when DJs see some of the new stuff that we post on DJWORX and simply dismiss then as toys. They’re not – they have functions on a par with what you might class as pro level. They’re just smaller and of a lesser quality, but they do all share a very common feature set and are  easily capable of filling a floor in the right hands. All DJ gear is capable of making people dance, but it’s actually nothing to do with the gear. That’s simply a tool to broadcast the music. As ever, being a DJ is about your skills, your music choice and your ability to read the crowd. As long as you have the right tools to play the right track, at the right time, and on beat, then you have everything you actually need. And you get those tools on just about every piece of DJ gear out there.

The Old Owner
  1. It seems to me that the gap is widening, not narrowing. Pro gear keeps getting more and more “pro” (and expensive) while beginner gear seems to keep getting more and more gimmicky.

    Way back when, when we all played on vinyl/turntables, the “pro” was the Technics 1200 and all the beginner gear was just a cheap reproduction of them. They didn’t try a bunch of gimmicks and features, they tried to make it just like the pro gear, but for less money (I said “tried to”).

    Today beginner gear is a bunch of flashing lights and overloaded with buttons while pro gear tends to be much more minimal in comparison. And the quality gap is still there, although that may be narrowing (I said “may be”).

  2. a very entertaining article, but i actually feel like it’s worst than simply skills being taken for granted… it’s the music itself. when it was a tape, and that tape wore out… i was cracking open the case and carefully splicing the tape back together. when it was a record, i was painstakingly cleaning them and sorting them on shelves. then came CD players, suddenly ripping pirated tracks were all the rage… and music became disposable almost overnight. it is apparent that new djs aren’t down with tried and true mixdowns, but also have a look in a lot of “crates” and you’ll find low-quality rips… sometimes with radio station or DJ drops intact.

    1. That is the principal concern to me as well. I think it trickles through to productions as well.

      Don’t get me wrong, I’m glad it doesn’t cost $10,000 and a full band to cut a single anymore…but at the same time I wonder if the world needs more mashups or EDM tracks made in an hour on a laptop.

  3. True, I like toys too, but I prefer to play on serious DJ equipment. Entry level might have a lot of B&W, but they don’t sound the same to my ears, they don’t handle the same abuse and they are not reliable for true live performances. Last, the image is also important.

    1. At least you admit image is a part of it. And there’s no doubt pioneer is top shelf, industrial pro quality audio equipment. (Finite details like pro level line volumes, etc, studio quality.)

      You can mix on gemini but it will break.. and maybe live.

      I’m glad to see pioneer not lagging behind.. I don’t want to see them fade like Nokia. Pioneer need only offer that top shelf quality for controllers in their classic style (like the ddj-t1..but even better…)

  4. I feel that now adays most controllers and mixers should have a dedicated filter. Though, that’s because I often use it to help eq. But what gets me design wise, is some of these entry level controllers leaving out the damned gain knob. What are these companies thinking. And the crazier thing is, the extra knob could fit in most of these silly plastic boxes.

        1. true but 90% of people buying beginner gear are only using the software it comes with and likely have no clue how to use gain to set levels. If you have skills, you step up and buy a product that has the features you need. Sadly that’s how it works.

  5. This article seems so ironically placed just a day before Pioneer unveils its new player with lots of shiny and cost attached to it, and will have everybody drooling for it… yet I share Mark’s view, foundations should be learned, and what matters is the music, not the gear itself… I’m glad I’m picking my very first pair or turntables this friday…

  6. Think you might cause another riot with the CDJ-phone? Like the CDJ turntable that everyone thought was real?

    Good article, I can remember way back when I was about 12-13 and getting my first CD deck with effects. That flanger sure got a workout. Now the only effect I ever use is an echo out or the very occasional filter.

  7. Wait… kids watch MtV?
    In seriousness, the basics aren’t being forgotten, though. If you don’t understand beatmatching, sync won’t work. I mean, it might line up the beats properly (nothing is perfect with is), but it won’t make the mix happen. Anything that prevents clipping doesn’t keep the signal clean. It might keep the speakers from blowing, but not knowing what mixing is it’s gonna suck. Not knowing HOW to use a filter, let alone WHAT it is, doesn’t help either. The fundamentals are required to actually be a DJ. It doesn’t matter what you call yourself.
    I think a better discussion is how “Pro” is classified. It isn’t, and in my opinion never was, about the gear. A pro DJ can walk into a club with a dual tape deck boom box and if they got the tunes, they’ll rock the party. A pro can rock a party on CDJs, Traktor, Serato, etc..